Do Retirees Still Need Life Insurance After 65?

Life insurance is often thought of as a product for working-age adults with dependents, but a growing number of retirees are asking whether coverage still makes financial sense well into their later years. Katy Ridge, a retirement planning specialist at Cornerstone Insurance in Greenville, Texas, addressed that question in a recently published HelloNation article aimed at Americans rethinking their financial priorities after age 65.

Ridge's guidance comes at a time when retirees face a complex mix of financial considerations, including estate planning, fixed income management, and rising healthcare costs. Whether to maintain, reduce, or drop life insurance coverage is a decision that depends heavily on individual circumstances, including outstanding debts, spousal dependency, and legacy goals.

Read more West Virginia Attorney Explains Car Crash Claims Against Negligent Drivers →

For some retirees, life insurance can serve purposes beyond income replacement — such as covering final expenses, leaving a tax-advantaged inheritance, or equalizing assets among heirs. For others, premiums may represent an unnecessary drain on retirement savings if financial obligations have largely been met. The calculus is rarely one-size-fits-all.

Financial advisers generally recommend that retirees conduct a thorough review of existing policies before making any decisions, factoring in the cash value of permanent policies and the cost of comparable coverage on the open market. Ridge's perspective, grounded in practical experience serving clients in North Texas, offers a regional but broadly applicable framework for navigating these choices.

Continue reading at All Financial Services & Investing.